We present the case of MR AB, a 30-year-old male, referred in August 2020 with central hypogonadism and a 10-year history of polydipsia and polyuria with an overnight water-deprivation test consistent with diabetes insipidus. His remaining pituitary profile was unaffected, and he was found to have pituitary stalk abnormalities on MRI. Following limited biochemical and radiological response to a steroid-course, he underwent a pituitary-stalk biopsy with histopathology consistent with IgG4 related hypophysitis (IgG4-RH). At present, no extra-pituitary manifestations of IgG4 related disease has been demonstrated, and he remains clinically well on GnRH analogue and desmopressin therapy.
IgG4-RH is diagnosed upon meeting criteria as described Leporati et al.(1). Given increasing recognition of its poorly specific nature, the need for a set of diagnostic criteria that can better differentiate between true IgG4-RH vs other pituitary autoimmune and inflammatory entities (which also meet Leporati’s biopsy criteria) has arisen (2,3).
In this clinical case study, we will review the strengths and pitfalls of our current diagnostic pathway for the diagnosis of IgG4-RH. We will describe the emergency of two distinct clinical phenotypes of IgG4-RH, which, while sharing many biochemical, radiological and histopathological findings, may either represent two distinct pathologies or part of a spectrum of the same disease process.
TAKE HOME POINTS